Kanban Teams Do Not Commit to Service Level Agreements

Here, Teamhood is called the best Kanban board in the world. You can use both functions of the Kanban system at the same time and use detail control in addition to work classification. Simple Kanban boards such as Trello, Asana, Jira, Clickup or Monday are oversimplified amateur implementations of Kanban, with which the work becomes tedious after a few months. Unless you are renovating your kitchen and there are no more than 50 tasks. For example, you can specify that a service is provided between 5 and 8 days. Customers will expect this. Thus, although it is not the same concept, there may be circumstances or organizations where an agreement and an expectation could have the same meaning. A key aspect of this process of observing your work and resolving/eliminating bottlenecks is looking at the intermediate waiting phases (the intermediate phases completed) and seeing how long the work tasks remain in these “transfer phases”. As you will learn, reducing the time spent during these waiting periods is the key to reducing cycle time. Improving workflow will make your team`s workflow deliveries smoother and more predictable. As this becomes more predictable, it becomes easier for you to make reliable commitments to your client about when you`ve completed the work you`re doing for them.

Improving your ability to reliably predict completion times is a big part of implementing a Kanban system! Typically, the final set of classifiers is decided based on the service level agreements held by the team, as well as the type of tasks performed by the team. Based on best practices and experience working with our customers, we have selected the following classes: This is the difference between service level agreement (SLA) and service level expectation (SLE). If the task is reproducible with a high degree of accuracy, an SLA can work well. Manufacturing facilities that use automation can know how many products they can produce per hour with a very high degree of accuracy and bind an SLA to it. Ultimately, applying WORK-in-Progress and SLA limits helps you reduce average cycle time and respond much faster to internal and external demands. That`s how it works for us. But as I said before, different teams work in different situations. If you think it`s not working for your team, you can ignore it. But at least try it. This will work well until you decide that standalone tasks are not acceptable and want a user story or a higher/larger level task to focus on the same board. It would be good to use swim lanes for higher level parking tasks, and then each swim lane would be used by lower/subordinate level tasks.

Look at the following example. Kanban teams don`t spend as much time estimating as ScrumXP teams. Instead, they examine the work required, dividing larger elements as needed and dragging the resulting stories through the Kanban system until they are completed, most of the time without worrying about their size. However, when planning THE IP, SAFe teams need to be able to estimate the need for work based on their capacity and also contribute to the estimates for the larger cross-team backlog elements (features). In addition, forecasting requires an understanding of the crew`s speed in a manner consistent with the other crews on the train and the overall speed of the ART. From this starting point, Kanban teams can calculate their actual throughput in stories per iteration by counting and simply averaging the number of stories delivered in previous iterations. Kanban teams then calculate their derived speed by multiplying the throughput by an average item size (typically three to five points). In this way, the SAFe ScrumXP and Kanban teams can participate in the broader economic framework, which in turn provides the main economic context of the portfolio. When teams find that many things need to be accelerated, the system can be overloaded.

Either the demand exceeds capacity, or the input process may require more discipline. In any case, the process must be adapted. First, let`s briefly discuss what the Service Level Agreement (SLA) is. In Kanban, the Service Level Agreement (SLA) is an agreement on a cycle time goal. The other aspect that characterizes SLA is the certainty that this cycle time can be respected. For those of you who are not familiar with Kanban, this may sound complicated, but it is not. Service Level Agreements (SLAs) precisely define a service provider`s responsibilities to its customers. They can range from binding formal contracts to informal agreements.

Depending on the service or industry in question, SLAs can cover service quality, availability/availability, support hours, emergency response, delivery times, etc. Comparing service levels over time with the agreement is a great way to track performance. From the customer`s point of view, a contract must be profitable. The purpose of the SLA itself is not to punish, it is used to monitor at the contract level what the state of the process is. The SLA can also be updated and developed taking into account historical data and evidence-based forecasts. I do not see a problem with doing that. It depends solely on the design of how the contract was built. Larger items tend to be more difficult to estimate, which increases the risk.

Therefore, they are broken down into stories, just like ScrumXP teams, to improve understanding, increase estimation accuracy, and make it easier for the product owner to prioritize work. The stories are then valued in standardized story points. This gives the company the ability to combine estimates from different types of teams – without excessive debate. At the portfolio and large solution level, it is often necessary to estimate larger work items in order to determine their potential economic viability (epics and capabilities). Developing a program roadmap also requires: Kanban teams use objective metrics, including average lead time, work in progress, and throughput, to understand their process and improve flow. The cumulative flowchart (CFD), shown in Figure 2, is an area chart that shows the amount of work in a given state, showing arrivals, time in a state, quantity in a state, and departure. It can work. But if you noticed, we just made a compromise: the actual classes of service were mixed with types of work items as well as with the hierarchy of work items. It`s no longer clean and can be confusing.

In addition, the Kanban method provides important principles and techniques for better management of service level agreement (SLA) obligations, just-in-time delivery of products to market, and minimization of risks and late costs. With concepts such as class of service, deferred engagement, and 2-phase validation, Kanban helps customers and delivery teams collaborate effectively and ensure the right things are done at the right time. SAFe teams have the choice between agile methods. Most use Scrum, a lightweight and popular framework for work management. Teams developing new code also apply extreme programming practices (XP) to focus on agile software engineering (see the Technical Agility section under Technical Agility and Team) and code quality (see the Built-in Quality Code Quality section). However, some teams, especially system teams, operations, maintenance, and support teams, choose to use Kanban as their primary method. In these contexts, the speed of work, the rapid evolution of priorities and the lower value of planning activities for the next iteration lead them to this choice. Blockages can be calculated. It is an agreement that can also be considered an obligation. Without them, it`s not clear how to manage customer expectations.

Customers can also set it if they want features of a service. You can also set the range of expectations for sending the service. To begin with, teams typically create an approximation of their current process flow and set some initial limits of work in progress. Figure 1 shows an example of an initial Kanban board of a team that captures the current state of the workflow: analysis, review, creation, integration, and testing. A key aspect of Kanban is to reduce the amount of multitasking that most teams and knowledge workers tend to do and instead encourage them to “Stop starting! And start finishing! “, a mantra made by Dr. Arne Roock (from www.Software-Kanban.de). WORK IN PROGRESS – The boundaries set at each stage of the workflow on a Kanban board encourage team members to complete the work in hand and then start the next job. Throughput – the number of completed stories per period – is another important metric. Because Kanban teams work in SAFe with an iteration cadence, they measure throughput as the number of stories delivered per iteration. I dare say that there must be agreements (SLAs) at the level of contracts, and to achieve them, we must work at the level of expectations (SLE).


filed under: Uncategorized